Why is it a 2.7t four-cylinder engine? Can such a big car really move with it?

Whether it drives well or not, just go for a test drive when the time comes.

Are you questioning the L3B?

You've already mentioned the T, so what do you think? It's just a 0.3 difference from the 3.0V6. If you're really concerned about those 20-30 peak horsepower that 0.3 brings, would you pay hundreds of thousands more for the 3.0V6? 😊

Just look at the engine displacement [I want to be quiet], it's not a broken three-cylinder anyway.

The GM L3B engine is a 2.7T four-cylinder with 500 N·m torque (1500–4000 rpm). If you switch to the GM 3.0TT V6 LGY engine, the peak torque range might be higher, but the peak torque only increases by 49 N·m. It will likely consume more fuel on the highway compared to the 2.7T, as the four-cylinder L3B features cylinder deactivation.

Do you think you're better than GM? Would GM import a car that can't run? The current situation is that as long as it's enough, it's fine.

Even if they give you a V6 or V8, you guys will say the fuel economy is poor. Haha, netizens always find something to complain about.

Sure, just bear with it. [Grin]

Trying the Prado 2.7's 0-100 km/h acceleration makes you question life.

What should I do with the Mercedes-Benz GLB 7-seater 1.3T? Should I cancel the purchase?