avatar
حسن ابيض
2024-08-23 14:09

This car should have the 3.6T V6 engine with 470 horsepower. I feel like those who can afford it wouldn't mind spending a bit more. The 2.7T four-cylinder engine is just too mediocre!

Comments( 8 )

avatar
مطلب حسين
مطلب حسين2024-08-28 17:56
Would you buy it for 1.3 million?
5
خدي سلمان
خدي سلمان2024-08-28 15:23
The power-to-weight ratio of this car is sufficient. It's mainly for family use and travel, not heavy off-roading. The idea of "small horse pulling a big cart" is mostly just imagination. How many have actually driven it?
3
1 replies
سلمان يعقوبي
سلمان يعقوبي2024-08-25 14:22
Sure, you could discuss with the government to lower taxes and ease environmental regulations... then your idea might come true.
13
1 replies
عبدالله زايد
عبدالله زايد2024-08-25 08:34
Enough
11
علي مأمون
علي مأمون2024-08-25 04:22
The 2.7L L3B engine is actually quite sufficient. It's used in many models like the Silverado and even the CT4-V. This engine has a significant amount of torque and a very broad torque curve. Additionally, the turbo that comes with this engine from the factory is surprisingly as large as the upgraded Stage 3 turbo on the Cadillac ATS. It's really impressive.
12
عبدالرحمن ثابت
عبدالرحمن ثابت2024-08-24 12:12
The CT6 really needs this 2.7.
14
أحمد بشر
أحمد بشر2024-08-24 08:58
I agree with that. It seems like it's not just me and the people around me who think this way. If it doesn't work out, we could consider the regular CT5-V series with the 3.0T. Logically speaking, if the 2.7T can be shared with longitudinal sedans, SUVs, and pickups, then why can't the 3.0T and 3.6T be supplied as well? They're also longitudinal. Honestly, GM might have been a bit misled. It should have been possible to test it earlier, and it probably wouldn't have been a big issue. Hopefully, they can reconfigure it in the future.
18
2 replies
فهد مروان
فهد مروان2024-08-23 14:59
The 3.0T engine on the original CT6 is fine.
1

fireIconRelated Posts

Top 1 Icon

I feel like it's better to spend a bit more and get a Geely Xingrui. Wouldn't it be nicer to buy a BBA with this money?

Top 1 Icon

Hey guys, people say the Maserati's V6 is the strongest 3.0T on the planet. But I see that the Ferrari 296 GTB's F163 engine has 663 horsepower (without the electric motor). So, which one is actually the strongest 3.0T?

Top 1 Icon

I hope there will be a fuel version with a longitudinal V6 engine, 380 horsepower, and 600 Nm. I really like this design. Get one for 400,000.

4

Why doesn't such a big car use the CT5-V's 3.0T V6 gasoline engine? That's not very American. 🤦‍♂️ I can understand not using a V8, but going straight to a 4-cylinder, what's up with that?

5

Why is it a 2.7t four-cylinder engine? Can such a big car really move with it?

6

I just think, if I just want to buy a Wuling and modify it a bit, wouldn't it be better than this? The interior is like a van! Not sure what modifications are needed after spending over 300,000 on a new one!

7

This car should have the 3.6T V6 engine with 470 horsepower. I feel like those who can afford it wouldn't mind spending a bit more. The 2.7T four-cylinder engine is just too mediocre!

8

Why is the 60+ equipped with the L3B? Wouldn't it be better to have a six-cylinder engine? The L3B would be great for the Cadillac CT5. Many people criticize the current engine, and now the 60+ with the L3B is going to be criticized again.

9

Is the 2023 Nissan X-Trail equipped with a three-cylinder or four-cylinder engine?

10

I went to the Toyota 4S store yesterday to check out this car. The exterior and interior are both acceptable. I'm just a bit concerned about one thing: the particulate filter is located in the middle section of the exhaust, which is a bit far from the engine. Theoretically, since it's a naturally aspirated hybrid engine, the operating temperature is lower and the filter is farther from the engine. Wouldn't the particulate filter be more prone to clogging? What do you experts think about this issue?

Related Car

Chevrolet Chevrolet Tahoe
Chevrolet TahoeAED 245,000 ~ 321,000Gasoline