avatar
عمر زبيدي
2022-09-26 20:25

I'm considering buying a 2015 MG 5 with a manual transmission. Could anyone share their experience with the fuel economy of the 1.4 naturally aspirated engine? Also, what are the pros and cons of the overall build quality of this car? Looking forward to your insights!

Comments( 1 )

avatar
أحمد عماد
أحمد عماد2022-09-26 21:20
1.4 doesn't have a naturally aspirated engine, only the 1.5 does.
2 replies

fireIconRelated Posts

Top 1 Icon

Comparing the 2004 Bluebird Sylphy 2.0 and the 2007 Passat 1.8T: 1. **Engine Performance**: - The Bluebird Sylphy 2.0 typically features a 2.0-liter engine, which might offer decent power and reliability for daily driving. - The Passat 1.8T comes with a turbocharged 1.8-liter engine, generally providing more horsepower and torque, which can result in better acceleration and performance. 2. **Fuel Economy**: - The Bluebird Sylphy might have slightly better fuel economy due to its naturally aspirated engine. - The Passat, with its turbocharged engine, could consume more fuel but may offer better performance. 3. **Driving Experience**: - The Bluebird Sylphy is often appreciated for its smooth and comfortable ride, suitable for everyday commuting. - The Passat, on the other hand, might provide a more engaging driving experience, especially with its turbocharged engine. 4. **Interior and Features**: - Both cars might offer similar interior comfort, but the Passat could have more advanced features, given it is a higher-end model. 5. **Reliability and Maintenance**: - The Bluebird Sylphy is generally known for its reliability and lower maintenance costs. - The Passat could require more frequent maintenance due to its turbocharged engine, but it is also known for its solid build quality. Overall, the choice depends on what you're prioritizing: fuel economy and reliability with the Bluebird Sylphy, or performance and features with the Passat.

Top 1 Icon

To determine which is larger, a 1.5L engine or a 1.4T engine, you need to understand the difference between naturally aspirated engines and turbocharged engines. A 1.5L engine refers to a naturally aspirated engine with a displacement of 1.5 liters. On the other hand, a 1.4T engine has a displacement of 1.4 liters but is turbocharged, meaning it has a turbocharger that increases its power output. In terms of displacement alone, 1.5L is larger than 1.4L. However, the turbocharger in the 1.4T can provide additional horsepower and torque, potentially making it feel more powerful than the 1.5L, depending on the specific engine designs and tuning. So, if you're looking at just the displacement, 1.5L is larger. But in terms of performance, the 1.4T might offer more power due to the turbocharging.

Top 1 Icon

I'm considering buying a 2015 MG 5 with a manual transmission. Could anyone share their experience with the fuel economy of the 1.4 naturally aspirated engine? Also, what are the pros and cons of the overall build quality of this car? Looking forward to your insights!

4

What type of oil is suitable for a 1.4 naturally aspirated manual engine? Is 5W-30 okay?

5

How's the range efficiency of this car? Is the charging really as fast as advertised? Are there any issues with driving it currently? I'm a blue plate Model S owner, and I'm considering switching to either the Model X or the Eletre. The Eletre does appeal to me a lot, but Tesla is still the leader in electric cars with its stable products (despite some minor build quality issues, but no problems while driving). Can any owners share some insights or pitfalls?

6

If you're deciding between the MG ZS and MG HS in Europe, here are some considerations: MG ZS comes with a 1.0T engine and a 6-speed automatic transmission. However, it's a three-cylinder engine. On the other hand, the MG HS features a 1.5T engine with a dry dual-clutch transmission and is a four-cylinder. There are reports online that the MG HS might experience significant jerking issues after a year or two due to the dry dual-clutch transmission. You might want to weigh the pros and cons of each engine and transmission type based on your driving preferences and needs.

7

If you're considering the Jetour X70, there are a few things to keep in mind. Here are some pros and cons based on general feedback: Pros: 1. **Design**: The Jetour X70 is often praised for its stylish design and aesthetic appeal, which seems to be one of the reasons you're considering it. 2. **Space**: It typically offers a spacious interior, making it comfortable for families and long trips. 3. **Features**: The vehicle usually comes equipped with a range of features that enhance comfort and convenience. Cons: 1. **Manual Transmission**: If you're looking at the manual version, consider whether you prefer this over an automatic, especially in heavy traffic conditions. 2. **Brand Recognition**: Jetour might not be as well-known as some other brands, which could affect resale value and brand trust. 3. **Performance**: Depending on your expectations, the performance in terms of horsepower and Fuel economy might not match some competitors. Overall, it's important to weigh these aspects based on your personal needs and preferences. If possible, test driving both the Jetour X70 and Jetour Dasheng could help you make a more informed decision.

8

I’ll share my personal test drive impressions of various SUVs in the same price range. Can anyone explain the difference in chassis feel between the GV70 Flagship and Luxury models? If there's someone who has driven both, please provide detailed insights! I've also tried SUVs of the same class like BBA, Volvo, and Jaguar. Personally, I think the new GLC has the best overall chassis quality, with Genesis coming in second. Genesis has the best sound insulation! The throttle response is the worst on the GLC! The X3, Q5, Genesis, Volvo, and Jaguar feel quite similar. Subjectively, the GV70 ranks in the top two for overall comfort and drivability. PS: The Q5 feels more filtered and softer. The X3 is a bit too ground-hugging and follows the road surface too much, which I don't like. Volvo is in the middle, but it has the worst sound insulation in its class! The GLC's chassis quality is great with a solid, integrated feel, but the throttle response is really lacking! The Jaguar F-Pace has a slightly firmer chassis and a more sporty driving feel, but its downside is average noise control with some resonance, and it has the smallest rear space. Genesis offers the best overall driving experience. Even with 21-inch wheels, the suspension is really excellent, and the power delivery is smooth and responsive. The space is similar to the X3.

Related Car

MG MG GT
MG GTAED 61,900 ~ 77,150Gasoline