Is it true that Zeekr cars have zero incidents of spontaneous combustion? I'm just curious, is that accurate?

It depends on how one defines spontaneous combustion.

It's like asking, "Have you never made a mistake in your life?" [I need some peace]

The one that's probably catching fire the most right now is the 86 001. It seems like there's a new incident almost every day lately.

Only BYD has eliminated spontaneous combustion.

The WE86 has already gone up in flames like a chain of camps.

Let's take a look at the nicknames for this brand: 1. The brand repeatedly emphasizes a joke about "zero self-ignition," earning the nickname "joker001." 2. Insists on comparing energy consumption despite lacking technology, earning "Electric Luxgen." 3. Tries to compete with others in design, earning "Ugly Krypton 007." 4. Battery issues that require power restriction to avoid self-ignition, earning "80V Soft Man." 5. Claims to have Volvo technology, but a certain model failed crash tests with broken A, B, and C pillars, earning "Sanitary Pad 001."

In the current situation with lithium batteries, no electric car can claim it won't catch fire. Except for those stubborn car manufacturers.

Seeing is believing! Zeekr cars have never spontaneously combusted. Don't believe the naysayers.

Strictly speaking, it is indeed zero naturally.

Zeekr not admitting it means it didn't burn.